Nepal Life Insurance Company (NLIC) has sent a letter of rebuttal to Banking Sansar, stating that its attention has been drawn to the news published on BankingSansar.com. The letter, signed by the company’s Chief Executive Officer Praveen Raman Parajuli, states that its attention has been drawn to the news published on BankingSansar.com.
We say,
1. The company has accused Bankingsansar.com of not making any response or attempt to know the truth from the company before writing the news. However, we have repeatedly contacted the information officer of the company, Binod Kumar Bujel.
2. Our news that Nepal Life is in an uproar, but the regulator is silent is based on the truth. But this news has been said by the company to be misleading. There has been a scuffle between the agents of the company in the program, the CEO has to warn, the leader of the agent has been arrested by the police, and the video of the agents protesting outside the program venue is viral on social media. And how did our news written on this topic become misleading? Isn’t this like a joke made by Nepal Life Insurance in the name of refutation?
नेपाल लाइफमा लफडै लफडा, नियामक नै ‘कब्जामा लिन’ यस्तो ट्रिक, विमित नै हच्किन थालेपछि बिजोग !
3. How did the news of abuse without even reading the name of the media become misleading? Artha Sarokar has been abused by sharing a screenshot of the news published on Artha Khabar.com. An agent who does not know how to read the news and does not know how to read it, is it misleading to post the news that an unrelated media has been abused? Isn’t this another joke?
4. How did the news headline ‘Amit Pheri’ controversy of Nepal Life become misleading? The letter of action taken by the regulatory insurance authority against Nepal Life regarding the appointment of Amit Kayal is public. The fact that he took money to study MBA without due process is public. It is clear that the validity of the document signed by him was questioned even when his name was written wrongly. And how did this news become misleading?
आफ्नो नामसमेत राम्रोसँग नहेरी सही गर्छन् नेपाल लाइफका हाकिम अमित कुमार, डकुमेन्टको बैधतामै प्रश्न !
5. It is a matter that the insured himself has accepted on social media that the insured is hesitant due to the controversy of Nepal Life. The insured have also called us and asked us. And how did it become misleading to write news on this subject?
6. The fact that Nepal Life has not paid the vendor’s money is clear to everyone that the employees are not staying in the brand team of Nepal Life, good employees have left. Is what everyone sees misleading? Why is the truth that the then CEO of Nepal Life Insurance, Santosh Prasai, has not been paid even after the contract is over? Don’t you have to pay after the work is over? And is it not public that good employees have left their jobs? After Neupane at Nepal Life, Meghendra Giri, after him Amit Jha. After Amit, now Pranish Shakya. Do you say that the employees are staying?
नेपाल लाइफको ब्राण्डिङ विभागमा किन टिक्दैनन् कर्मचारी ? हरेकजसो किन विवादैले छाड्छन् जागिर ?
7. The surprising thing is that the company has said that the news of kicking in the award program, the agent being taken away by the police, is also misleading. Isn’t this something that embarrasses the onlookers rather than the doers? The video of the police taking the agent into custody is already public, isn’t it? The agent himself has given a public statement about the kicking incident. Nepal Life itself has made public the pictures of the bouncers used in the program.
नेपाल लाइफका अभिकर्तामाथि ‘ज्यादती’ : सम्मान कार्यक्रममा पक्राउ परेपछि संघ आक्रोशित !
8. After so many scandals, how did the news of Nepal Life become misleading? The news that the regulator’s family is in Nepal Life is misleading, while the people within the family of the boss of the Insurance Authority are employed in Nepal Life. And how did the news become misleading?
9. The news titled ‘Miss Cell’s Net’ in Nepal Life is also based on the truth. How many complaints have reached the regulator on this issue, how many have reached us? Can this public debate be called misleading when it is made news?
10. Don’t pick up the phone when you call before publishing the news, get away with it on the pretext that there is a program, and now the news is misleading? Is this right?
We are clear that all the news about Nepal Life published on BankingSansar.com is based on facts. It would have been better if CEO Saap, who called the news misleading in the refutation, had also sent what is right!
